Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
verif_ref:do_dont [2016/11/14 05:27] elica |
verif_ref:do_dont [2016/11/14 06:28] (current) |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| |… advise, if your comment is FYI only | :-) FYI: in Zedish “with backbone” and “vertebrate” have the same root word, which makes the correct answer obvious. Unchanged by Ver| | |… advise, if your comment is FYI only | :-) FYI: in Zedish “with backbone” and “vertebrate” have the same root word, which makes the correct answer obvious. Unchanged by Ver| | ||
| |… use **impersonal** and **neutral** approach| :-) Verifier feels… Changed by Ver \\ :-( I think… I changed| | |… use **impersonal** and **neutral** approach| :-) Verifier feels… Changed by Ver \\ :-( I think… I changed| | ||
| - | |… run the **spell-checker** in your comments| :-( Spilling mistake corected by Ver| | + | |… run the **spell-checker** in your comments| :-( Spilling mistake corrected by Ver| |
| |… use **quotation marks** when referring to text| :-) The word "length" was adapted as "big". OK \\ :-( The word length was adapted as big. OK| | |… use **quotation marks** when referring to text| :-) The word "length" was adapted as "big". OK \\ :-( The word length was adapted as big. OK| | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| |… describe the issue through the action performed by you | :-( Ver changed “house” to “building” \\ :-) “building” translated as “house” | | |… describe the issue through the action performed by you | :-( Ver changed “house” to “building” \\ :-) “building” translated as “house” | | ||
| |… write comments that are not understandable to reviewers that do not understand the target language| :-( “քըցխ” changed to “իընշւխյւզգ” \\ (Which term is the comment referring to? Who made the change? Why?) \\ :-) “building” translated as “house” | | |… write comments that are not understandable to reviewers that do not understand the target language| :-( “քըցխ” changed to “իընշւխյւզգ” \\ (Which term is the comment referring to? Who made the change? Why?) \\ :-) “building” translated as “house” | | ||
| - | |… refer to other projects | :-( Ver prefers the answering categories as used in TIMSS \\ :-) Ver suggests categories “ZZ”, “YY”, “WW” for better equivalency to source | | + | |… refer to other projects | :-( Ver prefers the answering categories as used in TIMSS \\ :-) Ver suggests categories “ZZ”, “YY”, “WW” for better equivalence to source | |
| - | |… refer to other country version(s) | :-( Ver prefers the answering categories as used in the French version from Switzeralnd \\ :-) Ver suggests categories “ZZ”, “YY”, “WW” for better equivalence to source | | + | |… refer to other country version(s) | :-( Ver prefers the answering categories as used in the French version from Switzerland \\ :-) Ver suggests categories “ZZ”, “YY”, “WW” for better equivalence to source | |
| |… use sarcasm, criticism, exclamation marks, offensive language| :-( As usual, the Zedish team has AGAIN used as many as four different synonyms for “car”!!! while source uses same word throughout the unit \\ :-) Four different synonyms used for “building”. Harmonized by Ver \\ :-( Translation clumsy \\ :-) Translation not natural, better wording suggested by Ver | | |… use sarcasm, criticism, exclamation marks, offensive language| :-( As usual, the Zedish team has AGAIN used as many as four different synonyms for “car”!!! while source uses same word throughout the unit \\ :-) Four different synonyms used for “building”. Harmonized by Ver \\ :-( Translation clumsy \\ :-) Translation not natural, better wording suggested by Ver | | ||
| |… describe grammar or minor issues in great detail | :-( Possessive suffix ‘si’ missing. The suffix is always required if the main word is preceded by a possessive pronoun. Sometimes it can be dropped, if the ‘owner’ of the object is clear from context, but in this case this is not possible. \\ :-) Possessive suffix ‘si’ missing. | | |… describe grammar or minor issues in great detail | :-( Possessive suffix ‘si’ missing. The suffix is always required if the main word is preceded by a possessive pronoun. Sometimes it can be dropped, if the ‘owner’ of the object is clear from context, but in this case this is not possible. \\ :-) Possessive suffix ‘si’ missing. | | ||