Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- verif_ref:do_dont [2016/06/08 08:23]
roberta
+++ verif_ref:do_dont [2016/11/14 06:28] (current)
@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 |…describe how the target deviates from source \\ (rather than the other way around)| :-) “wild” added to “horse” "horse” translated as “wild horse” \\ :-( ENG source only reads “horse”, not “wild horse”|
 |…make sure that the **location** of your intervention is clear| :-) “True” and “False” left in English in the table heading|
-|…use **back-translations** whenever useful, and ALWAYS in the case of mistranslation| :-) “donkey” translated as “monkey”|
+|…use **back-translations** whenever useful, and ALWAYS in the case of mistranslation| :-) “donkey” translated as “monkey” \\ :-) "usually" was omitted in target  \\ :-) "once a week" was added in target|
 |… advise, if your comment is FYI only | :-) FYI: in Zedish “with backbone” and “vertebrate” have the same root word, which makes the correct answer obvious. Unchanged by Ver|
-|… ALWAYS advise whether or not you made an intervention | :-) OK now / Unchanged by Ver \\ :-) Text caption not fully visible. Ver was unable to change \\ :-( Text caption not fully visible|
 |… use **impersonal** and **neutral** approach| :-) Verifier feels…   Changed by Ver \\ :-( I think… I changed|
-|… run the **spell-checker** in your comments| :-( Spilling mistake corected by Ver|
+|… run the **spell-checker** in your comments| :-( Spilling mistake corrected by Ver|
 |… use **quotation marks** when referring to text| :-) The word "length" was adapted as "big". OK \\ :-( The word length was adapted as big. OK|
@@ Line 18: / Line 17: @@
 |… describe the issue through the action performed by you | :-( Ver changed “house” to “building” \\ :-) “building” translated as “house” |
 |… write comments that are not understandable to reviewers that do not understand the target language| :-( “քըցխ” changed to “իընշւխյւզգ” \\ (Which term is the comment referring to? Who made the change? Why?)  \\ :-) “building” translated as “house” |
-|… refer to other projects | :-( Ver prefers the answering categories as used in TIMSS \\ :-) Ver suggests categories “ZZ”, “YY”, “WW” for better equivalency to source |
+|… refer to other projects | :-( Ver prefers the answering categories as used in TIMSS \\ :-) Ver suggests categories “ZZ”, “YY”, “WW” for better equivalence to source |
+|… refer to other country version(s) | :-( Ver prefers the answering categories as used in the French version from Switzerland \\ :-) Ver suggests categories “ZZ”, “YY”, “WW” for better equivalence to source |
 |… use sarcasm, criticism, exclamation marks, offensive language| :-( As usual, the Zedish team has AGAIN used as many as four different synonyms for “car”!!! while source uses same word throughout the unit  \\ :-) Four different synonyms used for “building”. Harmonized by Ver \\ :-( Translation clumsy \\ :-) Translation not natural, better wording suggested by Ver |
-|… describe grammar issues in great detail | :-( Possessive suffix ‘si’ missing. The suffix is always required if the main word is preceded by a possessive pronoun. Sometimes it can be dropped, if the ‘owner’ of the object is clear from context, but in this case this is not possible. \\ :-) Possessive suffix ‘si’ missing. |
+|… describe grammar or minor issues in great detail | :-( Possessive suffix ‘si’ missing. The suffix is always required if the main word is preceded by a possessive pronoun. Sometimes it can be dropped, if the ‘owner’ of the object is clear from context, but in this case this is not possible. \\ :-) Possessive suffix ‘si’ missing. |
 |… use abbreviations or acronyms (except VER) | :-( BT of RO C is “donkey”.  Changed by ver. \\ :-) Back-translation of response option C is "donkey". Changed by ver. |
 ;-) Before delivering the work, **please read your comments through once more** to make sure they are understandable also when not looking at the verified file.